Just Words: The Authoritarian Nationalist Freedom Caucus
Contrary to most political and media expectations, democracy stood its ground in the November elections. But even before all the votes were counted and the celebrations subsided, the Washington Post unintentionally gave us a reminder of one big reason why this country remains in trouble.
In just five words – “the staunchly conservative Freedom Caucus” – the Post made clear it still hasn’t caught up with the reality of our politics today – or the truth of its own reporting. A dangerous authoritarian nationalism has infected and taken control of the Republican Party, and the Freedom Caucus is one of its power centers.
Especially in the age of Donald Trump, who has openly boasted about his ability to use the news media to carry his message because he was good for ratings, journalists have struggled with the Catch-22 of their deadline-driven jobs: It is hard to report on certain newsmakers without legitimizing the baseless, inflammatory words and actions they use to divide the nation and undermine faith in democratic institutions.
Journalists tend to be cautious about inserting their own opinions into their work. They shy away from drawing definitive conclusions or characterizing the newsmakers they cover with their own words. In the rush of the daily news stream, they typically let the newsmakers frame the narrative and define themselves and their opponents. For too long, journalists have been content to report from the political battlefield without explanation the verbal bombs lobbed by the warring factions, as if it were all simply how the system works. Conflict is good for ratings, as Trump understood, and it’s less worrisome to news consumers to see such conflict portrayed as politics as usual rather than an attack on our democratic rights and freedoms.
Newt Gingrich realized this early in his political career and is recognized for normalizing conflict politics. His confrontational style catapulted him to leadership roles from which he educated several generations of Republicans on the use of provocative language, whether it was justified or not, to vilify their Democratic opponents and extol the virtues of his own party. The journalists who covered those Republicans dutifully quoted them time after time for years.
These different characterizations are as accurate as the National Weather Service referring to a Category 5 hurricane as a storm with strong winds and rain.
When Journalists Don’t Embrace Their Own Conclusions
These Washington Post headlines make clear that something dangerous is happening in the Republican Party.
Republicans mostly mum on calls to make GOP ‘party of Christian nationalism’ August 19, 2022
Analysis | 3 ways election deniers are threatening U.S. democracy, explained November 1, 2022
Tracking which 2020 election deniers are winning, losing in the midterms November 7, 2022
Even thought The Washington Post and other news outlets have reported the election denials and religious nationalist declarations of Freedom Caucus members – and others in the GOP, those acknowledgements of a shift in Republican politics have failed to penetrate the editorial zeitgeist.
First organized in 2015, the Freedom Caucus is composed of about 40 Republican members of the House of Representatives, most of whom were first elected in 2010 or later and who are considered among the most unwilling to compromise on conservative policies. Originally chaired by Jim Jordan (OH) and now run by Scott Perry (PA), the Caucus is dominated by election deniers and Christian nationalists. Both Perry and Jordan have spread false claims of voter fraud and campaigned to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Members Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA) and Lauren Boebert (CO), both frequently spotlighted in the news for their incendiary remarks, have openly declared their belief that the United States is a Christian nation. Greene has even declared herself a Christian nationalist and Boebert has said the separation of church and state is ”junk”.
The Freedom Caucus, led by these outspoken individuals, value loyalty to themselves and their party over their oath of office. They stand for the imposition of their views whether or not they are supported by democratic processes and in contradiction to the Constitution and laws of the United States. This makes them not “staunchly conservative” but dangerously authoritarian.
Journalists – including their unbylined editors – need to have the courage and independence to state at every opportunity what is painfully obvious.
Members of the Freedom Caucus are undermining the integrity of our elections, scorning the processes and institutions of governing, and advocating for the imposition of a state religion. Until journalists begin to hold them accountable and portray them and their Caucus as enemies of the Constitution and American democracy, and not merely as staunch or hard-line participants in the routines of partisan politics, they will be failing in their role as watchdogs of democracy.
Nate Hine and Nellie Pennington: Advocates for Children
Why Applaud as the National Debt Continues to Soar?
Election-Related Decisions Indicate Courts Still Favor Democracy
Protecting Voting Rights and Our Elections
The truth is out there…
but it’s often lost in the 24/7 news stream or distorted or obscured, often intentionally so, by the people who make the news. The American Leader follows historical storylines to home in on what’s really happening beneath the surface of today’s headlines. We sift through the info stream for you, consulting and processing hundreds of sources that may not make the headlines to connect the dots and clarify the problems we face and showcase the efforts being made to solve them. It’s time-consuming work that needs your support.
but it’s often lost in the 24/7 news stream or distorted or obscured, often intentionally so, by the people who make the news. The American Leader follows historical storylines to home in on what’s really happening beneath the surface of today’s headlines. We sift through the infostream for you, consulting and processing hundreds of sources to connect the dots and clarify the problems we face and showcase the efforts being made to solve them. It’s time-consuming work that needs your support.
We have to expect more to get more. We can make this a better country but only if we believe improving on the status quo is possible. A lot of people do believe and are hard at work to solve our systemic problems. We bring you their stories.